Franchise Decision Radar

Lawn Doctor vs. Spring-Green: what the FDD data shows

Two of the longest-running lawn care franchises in the U.S., with different ownership structures, fee models, and growth trajectories. All data from 2025 FDDs filed with the Wisconsin DFI.

Side-by-Side Snapshot

Lawn Doctor Spring-Green
Franchised outlets 653 126
Initial investment $150K–$177K $117K–$134K
Annual fees at $300K $78,800 (26.3%) $45,318 (15.1%)
3-year net growth +40 units +4 units
System trajectory Accelerating Flat
Royalty structure 10% 10% / 9% / 8%
Franchising since 1967 1977

All data from 2025 FDDs filed with the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions. Fee burden figures Modeled at $300K gross revenue, Year 5, single territory.

Fee Burden

Both brands charge a tiered royalty, but Spring-Green’s total fee burden is substantially lower at every modeled revenue level. Lawn Doctor charges 10% flat royalty plus a local advertising minimum of $30,000/year (or 10% of Net Revenues) plus a national fund. Spring-Green charges a triple-tiered royalty (10%/9%/8%) with a national fund of 2% and a lower local marketing threshold.

At $300K revenue, Lawn Doctor’s total fee burden is $78,800 (26.3%). Spring-Green’s is $45,318 (15.1%). That’s a $33,482/year difference — driven primarily by Lawn Doctor’s higher marketing requirements and flat 10% royalty vs. Spring-Green’s tiered structure that drops to 8% above $500K.

Revenue Level Lawn Doctor Spring-Green Difference
$200,000 $68,300 (34.2%) $33,818 (16.9%) $34,482/yr
$300,000 $78,800 (26.3%) $45,318 (15.1%) $33,482/yr
$400,000 $100,800 (25.2%) $56,318 (14.1%) $44,482/yr
$500,000 $122,800 (24.6%) $67,318 (13.5%) $55,482/yr
Lawn Doctor’s out-of-territory surcharge
Lawn Doctor charges a 15% royalty surcharge on revenue earned outside the franchisee’s territory (25% total: 10% base + 15% surcharge). This structurally discourages geographic expansion beyond assigned boundaries.
Spring-Green’s upfront marketing cost
Spring-Green charges a $35,000 Initial Marketing Campaign Fee + $16,500 Property Data Fee at signing ($51,500 total beyond the franchise fee). These are one-time costs, not ongoing, but they increase the true entry cost above the headline franchise fee.

System Health

Lawn Doctor’s system health trajectory is accelerating: +11, +6, +23 net units over three years, with terminations dropping from 13 (2022) to 1 (2024). The system grew to 653 outlets, the largest in the lawn cohort.

Spring-Green’s trajectory is flat: +2, −2, +4 over the same period. The system has hovered around 152–156 outlets. Affiliate Superior Lawns reacquired 4 franchised territories over 2023–2024 — company buying back territories is a mixed signal that could indicate either strategic consolidation or franchisee exit.

The scale difference is significant: Lawn Doctor has 4× the outlets. Spring-Green’s smaller system and flat growth mean less network effect for brand recognition and peer learning, but also less intra-brand competition for territory.

Year Lawn Doctor Spring-Green
Net Change End Count Net Change End Count
2022 +11 624 +2 128
2023 +6 630 -4 124
2024 +23 653 +2 126

Cost to Enter

Lawn Doctor’s initial investment ranges from $150K–$177K, anchored by its $127,000 franchise fee (the highest in the lawn cohort). Spring-Green’s ranges from $118K–$134K, with a $45,000 franchise fee plus $51,500 in mandatory upfront marketing and data fees.

Spring-Green is $32K–$43K cheaper to enter. However, buyers should note that Spring-Green’s $51,500 in upfront marketing and data fees is not a one-time franchise fee — it is additional required spending that makes the true cost closer to $96,500 before any other startup expenses.

Key Watchouts

Lawn Doctor

Spring-Green

Where the Tradeoffs Land

Lawn Doctor has scale (653 outlets), the deepest Item 19 in the cohort (16-year revenue trend, customer tenure data, gross profit margins), and accelerating growth. Average franchisee revenue of $1.13M with 85.4% gross margin (materials only) and 6.15-year average customer tenure. The brand has demonstrated long-term revenue growth: from $367K average in 2009 to $1.13M in 2024.

Spring-Green is privately held (no PE layers), costs less to enter, and costs substantially less to operate ($33K/year less in fees at $300K revenue). Its Item 19 shows average gross sales of $1.09M with 81.3% customer retention and a marketing ROI of $2.62 per dollar invested. It also offers pest control as an add-on service.

A buyer who prioritizes lower ongoing costs, private ownership, and a pest-control add-on has a rationale for Spring-Green. A buyer who prioritizes scale, data depth, and a system with accelerating momentum has a rationale for Lawn Doctor — but should model whether the $33K/year fee premium is justified by the incremental revenue opportunity. Both have $99 Decision Reports available.

Go Deeper

Lawn Doctor review →
Fee modeling, Item 19 translation, risk flags, discovery-day questions
Spring-Green review →
Fee modeling, Item 19 translation, risk flags, discovery-day questions

See the full fee burden, system health, and cost-to-enter comparisons across all 6 lawn brands.